【发布时间】:2019-10-08 19:48:12
【问题描述】:
我尝试使用nlme 和lsoda 拟合一阶微分模型。
这是基本思想:我首先定义允许生成微分方程解的函数:
library(deSolve)
ODE1 <- function(time, x, parms) {with(as.list(c(parms, x)), {
import <- excfunc(time)
dS <- import*k/tau - (S-yo)/tau
res <- c(dS)
list(res)})}
solution_ODE1 = function(tau1,k1,yo1,excitation,time){
excfunc <- approxfun(time, excitation, rule = 2)
parms <- c(tau = tau1, k = k1, yo = yo1, excfunc = excfunc)
xstart = c(S = yo1)
out <- lsoda(xstart, time, ODE1, parms)
return(out[,2])
}
然后我根据两个 ID 的等式生成数据:
time <- 0:49
excitation <- c(rep(0,10),rep(1,10),rep(0,10),rep(1,10),rep(0,10))
simu_data <- data.frame(signal = c(solution_ODE1(3,2,0.1,excitation,time)+rnorm(length(time),0,0.1),
solution_ODE1(3.2,1.5,0.3,excitation,time)+rnorm(length(time),0,0.1)),
time = rep(time,2),
excitation = rep(excitation,2),
ID = rep(c("A","B"),each = length(time)))
这是它的样子:
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(simu_data)+
geom_point(aes(time,signal,color = "signal"),size = 2)+
geom_line(aes(time,excitation,color = "excitation"))+
facet_wrap(~ID)
然后我尝试使用 nlme 来适应:
fit1 <- nlme(signal ~ solution_ODE1(damping,gain,eq,excitation,time),
data = simu_data,
fixed = damping + gain + eq ~1,
random = damping ~ 1 ,
groups = ~ ID,
start = c(damping = 5, gain = 1,eq = 0))
我得到了这个错误,我没有得到:
eval(substitute(expr), data, enclos = parent.frame()) 中的错误: 找不到对象“k”
traceback 表明错误来自 ODE1 模型,该模型在生成值时有效。
16. eval(substitute(expr), data, enclos = parent.frame())
15. eval(substitute(expr), data, enclos = parent.frame())
14. with.default(as.list(c(parms, x)), {
import <- excfunc(time)
dS <- import * k/tau - (S - yo)/tau
res <- c(dS) ...
13. with(as.list(c(parms, x)), {
import <- excfunc(time)
dS <- import * k/tau - (S - yo)/tau
res <- c(dS) ...
12. func(time, state, parms, ...)
11. Func2(times[1], y)
10. eval(Func2(times[1], y), rho)
9. checkFunc(Func2, times, y, rho)
8. lsoda(xstart, time, ODE1, parms)
7. solution_ODE1(damping, gain, eq, excitation, time)
6. eval(model, data.frame(data, pars))
5. eval(model, data.frame(data, pars))
4. eval(modelExpression[[2]], envir = nlEnv)
3. eval(modelExpression[[2]], envir = nlEnv)
2. nlme.formula(signal ~ solution_ODE1(damping, gain, eq, excitation,
time), data = simu_data, fixed = damping + gain + eq ~ 1,
random = damping ~ 1, groups = ~ID, start = c(damping = 5,
gain = 1, eq = 0))
1. nlme(signal ~ solution_ODE1(damping, gain, eq, excitation, time),
data = simu_data, fixed = damping + gain + eq ~ 1, random = damping ~
1, groups = ~ID, start = c(damping = 5, gain = 1, eq = 0))
有人知道我应该如何进行吗?
编辑
我尝试按照 mikeck 的建议进行修改:
ODE1 <- function(time, x, parms) {
import <- parms$excfunc(time)
dS <- import*parms$k/parms$tau - (x["S"]-parms$yo)/parms$tau
res <- c(dS)
list(res)}
生成数据没有问题。但是现在使用nlme 给出:
checkFunc(Func2, times, y, rho) 中的错误: func()返回的导数个数(0)必须等于初始条件向量的长度(100)
具有以下回溯:
> traceback()
10: stop(paste("The number of derivatives returned by func() (",
length(tmp[[1]]), ") must equal the length of the initial conditions vector (",
length(y), ")", sep = ""))
9: checkFunc(Func2, times, y, rho)
8: lsoda(xstart, time, ODE1, parms) at #5
7: solution_ODE1(damping, gain, eq, excitation, time)
6: eval(model, data.frame(data, pars))
5: eval(model, data.frame(data, pars))
4: eval(modelExpression[[2]], envir = nlEnv)
3: eval(modelExpression[[2]], envir = nlEnv)
2: nlme.formula(signal ~ solution_ODE1(damping, gain, eq, excitation,
time), data = simu_data, fixed = damping + gain + eq ~ 1,
random = damping ~ 1, groups = ~ID, start = c(damping = 5,
gain = 1, eq = 0))
1: nlme(signal ~ solution_ODE1(damping, gain, eq, excitation, time),
data = simu_data, fixed = damping + gain + eq ~ 1, random = damping ~
1, groups = ~ID, start = c(damping = 5, gain = 1, eq = 0))
【问题讨论】:
-
你试过
nlmeODE包吗? -
我实际上正在尝试。我对它有点困难,但也许它会奏效。我仍然很高兴为这种奇怪的行为找到解决方案/解释
-
我做了一些调整 - 参数应该使用 list(),而不是 c(),并且我已经制作了
xstart <- yo1(然后在ODE1中直接引用x,但我仍然收到“非法输入”消息... -
您是否尝试过将
ODE1()重新定义为不使用with(),即使用parms$k等?错误消息看起来可能是一个以某种方式出现的范围界定问题。 -
@mikeck 我试过了,它改变了错误信息。我编辑了我的问题。我不明白
nlme在内部做什么,但它看起来为函数提供了初始条件向量,从而产生错误