【发布时间】:2012-12-05 21:22:53
【问题描述】:
我正在尝试使用 SUT Factory 'pattern' 创建我的 SUT。
给定 SUT 结构:
namespace MySut
{
public class Dep1
{
}
public class Dep2
{
}
public class Sut
{
public Sut( Dep1 dep1, Dep2 dep2 )
{
}
}
}
我正在使用AutoFixture,我想知道折叠以下规范和相关 SUT 工厂方法 [有价值但] 忙碌的最佳方法是什么:
namespace MySpecifications
{
using MySut;
public class MySpecification
{
public void TestCore()
{
// Dont care about dependencies, testing core functionality
var sut = CreateSut();
}
public void TestDep1Interaction()
{
// Dont care about Dep2, want to observe stuff on the Dep1 dependent object
var sut = CreateSut( new Mock<Dep1>().Object );
}
public void TestDep2Interaction()
{
// Dont care about Dep1, want to observe stuff on the Dep2 dependent object
var sut = CreateSut( new Mock<Dep2>().Object );
}
private object CreateSut( )
{
return CreateSut( CreateDep1(), CreateDep2() );
}
private object CreateSut( Dep1 dep1 )
{
return CreateSut( dep1, CreateDep2() );
}
private object CreateSut( Dep2 dep2 )
{
return CreateSut( CreateDep1(), dep2 );
}
private Sut CreateSut( Dep1 dep1, Dep2 dep2 )
{
return new Sut( dep1, dep2 );
}
private static Dep1 CreateDep1()
{
return new Fixture().CreateAnonymous<Dep1>();
}
private static Dep2 CreateDep2()
{
return new Fixture().CreateAnonymous<Dep2>();
}
}
}
类似于:
public class MyAutoFixturedSpecification
{
public void TestCore()
{
// Dont care about dependencies, testing core functionality
var sut = CreateSut();
}
public void TestDep1Interaction()
{
// Dont care about Dep2, want to observe stuff on the Dep1 dependent object
var sut = CreateSut( new Mock<Dep1>().Object );
}
public void TestDep2Interaction()
{
// Dont care about Dep1, want to observe stuff on the Dep2 dependent object
var sut = CreateSut( new Mock<Dep2>().Object );
}
private object CreateSut( params object[] injectedNonAnonymouses )
{
return new Fixture( ).Build<Sut>( )./*??????*/;
}
}
或:
public class MyAnticipatedAutoFixturedSpecification
{
public void TestCore()
{
// Dont care about dependencies, testing core functionality
var sut = new Fixture( ).Build<Sut>().CreateAnonymous( );
}
public void TestDep1Interaction()
{
// Dont care about Dep2, want to observe stuff on the Dep1 dependent object
var sut = new Fixture().Build<Sut>()/*.With( new Mock<Dep1>().Object )*/.CreateAnonymous();
}
public void TestDep2Interaction()
{
// Dont care about Dep1, want to observe stuff on the Dep2 dependent object
var sut = new Fixture().Build<Sut>()/*.With( new Mock<Dep2>().Object )*/.CreateAnonymous();
}
}
即删除所有工厂垃圾,以便我的规范可以轻松应对过渡到:
namespace MySutWithNewDependency
{
public class Dep1
{
}
public class Dep2
{
}
public class Dep3
{
}
public class Sut
{
public Sut( Dep1 dep1, Dep2 dep2, Dep3 dep3 )
{
}
}
}
虽然与自动模拟容器的概念有重叠,但我仍然不是在寻找金锤子 - 只是一种能够一次模拟 0 或 1 个事物并能够自定义创建依赖项的方法对象,而不必在其依赖项集更改时重新访问对 Sut 构造函数的显式调用。
(也使用 xUnit.net(SubSpec 样式)、Moq、Ninject2(虽然我不想在我的规范中使用 DI))
【问题讨论】:
标签: tdd moq xunit autofixture